Kocher v. Baird
Dean Kocher v. Roland Baird
Kocher v. Baird, 174 A.D.2d 1042 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Purple, J. We add only that we do not address issues raised for the first time on appeal by defendants. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Purple, J.—Partition and Sale.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.