TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Lalone

In the Matter of Bernard H. Lalone, Jr., an Attorney, Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department

In re Lalone, 175 A.D.2d 944 (1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 8, 1991
Judges
Mahoney
Citations
175 A.D.2d 944573 N.Y.S.2d 4211991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10953

Opinion of the Court — Mahoney

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

— Motion by petitioner Committee on Professional Standards, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f), to suspend respondent from the practice of law by reason of his February 14, 1991 conviction in Chenango County Court of the misdemeanors of forgery third degree (Penal Law § 170.05) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25), granted.

Mahoney, P. J.,

Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the motion is granted and respondent is suspended effective immediately and until a final disciplinary order is entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g), and it is further ordered that the motion is granted and respondent is suspended effective immediately and until a final disciplinary order is entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g), and it is further ordered that respondent show cause, at a time to be specified by the Clerk of the Court, why a final order of suspension, censure or removal from office should not be made pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g), and it is further ordered that for the period of suspension respondent be and hereby is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or agent, or as clerk or employee of another; and he hereby is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor at law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice with relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of section 806.9 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred, suspended or resigned attorneys, a copy of which section is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2008: 120082026peak 2008 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Herzog52 A.D.3d 1019 (2008)

Most recent

  1. In re Herzog52 A.D.3d 1019 (2008)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list