People v. Rivera
The People of the State of New York v. Ruben Rivera
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: It was in the trial court’s discretion to grant an *1093 order excluding witnesses from observing the trial, and the fact that a witness might have disobeyed such order does not disqualify the witness from testifying (see, People v Cody, 182 AD2d 1089 [decided herewith]; People v Lloyde, 106 AD2d 405 ; see also, Richardson, Evidence § 462, at 451 [Prince 10th ed]). Defendant’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct on cross-examination and summation, were not preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6]; People v Brooks, 163 AD2d 864 , lv denied 76 NY2d 984 ). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.