Sharief v. Leonardo
In the Matter of Rashid Sharief v. Arthur A. Leonardo, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— Proceeding' pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
The Attorney-General advised this Court that respondents would not be submitting a brief and have submitted administrative memoranda indicating that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s record. Inasmuch as the initial determination has been administratively reversed, the controversy has ended and respondents’ motion to dismiss should be granted (see, Matter of Wong v Coughlin, 150 AD2d 832 ).
Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.