People v. Henry
The People of the State of New York v. David Henry
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no evidence in the record of the suppression hearing to show that defendant’s arraignment was delayed for the purpose of depriving defendant of his right to counsel. Defendant is not entitled to a new hearing to present additional evidence, having had the opportunity at the first hearing to litigate that issue (see, People v Cofresi, 60 NY2d 728 ). Moreover, any delay in the arraignment was justified in light of the ongoing murder investigation (see, People v Hopkins, 58 NY2d 1079 ; People v Barker, 168 AD2d 211 , lv denied 77 NY2d 875 ).
We have examined the other issues raised by defendant and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.