Pantages v. L.G. Airport Hotel Associates, Inc.
Carol Pantages v. L.G. Airport Hotel Associates, Inc., Doing Business as Sheraton Inn-LaGuardia, and Andrea Motel Corp.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J., and a jury), entered May 16, 1991, which, insofar as appealed from, is in favor of plaintiff Pantages and against defendant Andrea Motel Corp. in the amount of $1.5 million for past pain and suffering and $375,000 for future pain and suffering after reduction for defendant’s 50% proportionate share of liability as found by the jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Upon review of the record, we find no infirmity in the jury’s verdict against defendant motel, there being evidence which, fairly construed, shows that plaintiff was brutally raped, sodomized and assaulted by three men, that some of these acts occurred in a room rented for a "short-stay” at defendant motel, and that plaintiff was unable to walk and was carried into the motel room by her assailants in full view of the clerk on duty. Such evidence was sufficient to support a finding that defendant breached its duty of reasonable care to persons lawfully on its premises. While defendant does not have a duty to protect the public in general against criminal acts, certainly it has a duty to prevent its premises from being used for the commission of a crime committed upon one of its guests, and, toward that end, it was incumbent upon defendant to question the motel registrants and refuse them a room, if necessary.
The court did not err in refusing to apportion liability among the three criminal perpetrators (CPLR 1602 [5]).
*274 We have considered the remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. [As amended by order entered Dec. 28, 1992.] Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(affirming jury verdict against motel owner in favor of woman who was raped and sodomized in her motel room)
-
(upholding $1.875 million award for past and future pain and suffering where plaintiff was raped, sodomized, and assaulted by three men)
-
(upholding award of $1,875 million for rape and sodomy in hotel)
-
($1.5 million for past pain and suffering and $375,000 for future pain and suffering, reduced by jury’s finding of 50% contributory negligence)
-
(plaintiff was carried into motel by her assailants in full view of the clerk on duty)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.