TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Reid

The People of the State of New York v. Elkanah Reid

People v. Reid, 192 A.D.2d 1117 (1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 14, 1993
Citations
192 A.D.2d 1117596 N.Y.S.2d 2821993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4142

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for review his present contention that County Court abused its discretion by failing to impose a sanction upon the People for a Rosario violation (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , rearg denied 9 NY2d 908 , cert denied 368 US 866 , rearg denied 14 NY2d 876 , 15 NY2d 765 ). Defendant cannot rely upon an objection by codefendant’s counsel to preserve the issue (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Buckley, 75 NY2d 843, 846), and we decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice.

County Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a severance. The proof against both defendants was supplied by the same evidence and defendant failed to offer a "cogent reason” for severance (People v Bornholdt, 33 NY2d 75, 87 , cert denied sub nom. Victory v New York, 416 US 905 ). No Bruton violation (see, Bruton v United States, 391 US 123 ) occurred because the codefendant’s statement was not admitted on the People’s direct case, but was used only for impeachment of the codefendant on cross-examination.

Defendant failed to preserve for review his present argument that the chemist’s testimony was insufficient to prove the accuracy of the scale she used to weigh the cocaine (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bien, 77 NY2d 885). We decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1994: 11995: 219942026peak 1995 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Klavoon207 A.D.2d 979 (1994)
  2. People v. Neil213 A.D.2d 1014 (1995)
  3. People v. Holiday213 A.D.2d 672 (1995)

Most recent

  1. People v. Holiday213 A.D.2d 672 (1995)
  2. People v. Neil213 A.D.2d 1014 (1995)
  3. People v. Klavoon207 A.D.2d 979 (1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) 7,533
People v. Rosario, 173 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1961) 1,051
People v. Bornholdt, 305 N.E.2d 461 (N.Y. 1973) 268
Victory v. New York, 416 U.S. 905 (1974) 147
People v. Buckley, 552 N.E.2d 160 (N.Y. 1990) 115
People v. Dien, 571 N.E.2d 69 (N.Y. 1991) 87

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list