TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vasquez v. Zambrano

Milta Vasquez v. Jorge Zambrano

Vasquez v. Zambrano, 196 A.D.2d 840 (1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 20, 1993
Citations
196 A.D.2d 840602 N.Y.S.2d 291993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8586

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In an action, inter alia, for partition, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), entered October 15, 1990, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint and granted the defendant Jorge Zambrano judgment on his first counterclaim to impose a constructive trust upon the plaintiffs interest in the house.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the third and fourth decretal paragraphs thereof, and adding thereto a provision dismissing Jorge Zambrano’s first counterclaim; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff and the defendant Jorge Zambrano (hereinafter the defendant) defrauded a mortgage company by adding a third party to the contract of sale, the mortgage application, and the deed, in order to obtain a mortgage when purchasing a two-family house in Nassau County. After the closing, the parties then cohabited in the house for two years. The plaintiff vacated the house when the parties terminated their relationship. The plaintiff brought this action, seeking, inter alia, partition and sale of the house. In his first counterclaim, the defendant sought to have a constructive trust imposed upon the plaintiffs interest in the house. The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint and granted the defendant relief on this counterclaim.

Because both parties had unclean hands in connection with the purchase of this house, they are both barred from all equitable relief (see, Ta Chun Wang v Chun Wong, 163 AD2d 300 , lv denied 77 NY2d 804 , cert denied — US —, 111 S Ct 2893 ). Accordingly, the defendant’s first counterclaim is dismissed. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Ritter and Joy, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1995: 11996: 12001: 12002: 12005: 22006: 12009: 12024: 119952026peak 2005 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. M.R. v. D.R.2024 NY Slip Op 50295(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Westchester Cty. 2024)
  2. Kopsidas v. Krokos294 A.D.2d 406 (2002)
  3. Guneratne v. Guneratne214 A.D.2d 871 (1995)
  4. Walker v. Walker289 A.D.2d 225 (2001)
  5. Bernstein v. Bernstein18 A.D.3d 683 (2005)
  6. Medric Construction, Inc. v. J.W. Mays, Inc.230 A.D.2d 832 (1996)

Most recent

  1. M.R. v. D.R.2024 NY Slip Op 50295(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Westchester Cty. 2024)
  2. Dolny v. Borck61 A.D.3d 817 (2009)
  3. Gutman v. Gutman31 A.D.3d 709 (2006)
  4. Bernstein v. Bernstein18 A.D.3d 683 (2005)
  5. Festinger v. Edrich8 Misc. 3d 700 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2005)
  6. Kopsidas v. Krokos294 A.D.2d 406 (2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ta Chun Wang v. Chun Wong, 163 A.D.2d 300 (1990) 24

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list