Ferry v. Poughkeepsie Galleria Co.
James Ferry v. Poughkeepsie Galleria Company
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Although plaintiffs’ commercial lease contained a provision waiving the right to trial by jury of any action arising out of that lease, that waiver does not apply to plaintiffs’ causes of action alleging that plaintiff Ferry was induced to enter into the lease agreement by defendant’s fraudulent misrepresentations (see, Bank of N Y. v Cheng Yu Corp., 67 AD2d 961 ; Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v Champagne, 55 Misc 2d 413 ; Federal Housecraft v Faria, 28 Misc 2d 155 ). Further, plaintiffs did not waive their right to a jury trial on those causes of action by seeking, in addition to money damages, the equitable remedy of rescission (see, Federal House-craft v Faria, supra). Thus, Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial of the fraudulent inducement causes of action. We modify the order, however, to strike plaintiffs’ jury demand with respect to the remaining cause of action for breach of contract. The contractual jury waiver provision fully applies to that cause of action. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J.—Strike Jury Demand.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.