TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Claim of Camerino

In the Matter of the Claim of Alfred M. Camerino, Vassar College, Respondent John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor

In re the Claim of Camerino, 222 A.D.2d 796 (1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 7, 1995
Citations
222 A.D.2d 796634 N.Y.S.2d 2731995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12644

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 30, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as the supervisor of electricians at Vassar College. He was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Upon review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports this determination. Claimant’s manager testified that claimant became loud and used profanity when questioned about a particular job. He stated that claimant thereafter failed to report to his office as requested and left the job site. In view of this, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2001: 120012026peak 2001 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Claim of De Witt288 A.D.2d 601 (2001)

Most recent

  1. In re the Claim of De Witt288 A.D.2d 601 (2001)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list