TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Joseph v. Giacalone

Alan H. Joseph v. Joseph Giacalone

Joseph v. Giacalone, 224 A.D.2d 391 (1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 5, 1996
Citations
224 A.D.2d 391637 N.Y.S.2d 7711996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 855

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

—In an action to recover attorney’s fees, in which a judgment was entered September 23, 1992, in favor of the plaintiff in the principal sum of $20,000, the defendant judgment debtor appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated December 7, 1993, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to "turn over to [the] plaintiff the check from the U.S. Postal Service in the approximate sum of $9,000”.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff’s motion is denied.

We agree with the defendant judgment debtor that the proceeds of the check in dispute are exempt from garnishment or levy pursuant to Federal law (see, 5 USC § 8346 [a]; Matter *392 of Dickerson, 168 Misc 54 ; Waggoner v Game Sales Co., 702 SW2d 808 [Ark]; see also, Surace v Danna, 248 NY 18 ; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v Harris, 854 P2d 921 [Okla]). Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1998: 22000: 12009: 119982026peak 1998 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Nixon v. McClure969 S.W.2d 801 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
  2. Bertha Tom v. First American Credit Union151 F.3d 1289 (1st Cir. 1998)
  3. In re Hunt250 B.R. 482 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2000)
  4. In re Anderson410 B.R. 289 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2009)

Most recent

  1. In re Anderson410 B.R. 289 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2009)
  2. In re Hunt250 B.R. 482 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2000)
  3. Bertha Tom v. First American Credit Union151 F.3d 1289 (1st Cir. 1998)
  4. State ex rel. Nixon v. McClure969 S.W.2d 801 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Surace v. Danna, 161 N.E. 315 (N.Y. 1928) 134
Waggoner v. Game Sales Co., 702 S.W.2d 808 (Ark. 1986) 7
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Harris, 1993 OK CIV APP 99, 854 P.2d 921 6
In re the Estate of Dickerson, 168 Misc. 54 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list