TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Boutique Industries, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Boutique Indus. v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights, 228 A.D.2d 171 (1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 4, 1996
Citations
228 A.D.2d 171643 N.Y.2d 986643 N.Y.S.2d 9861996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6283
Cited by 9 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of discrimination. However, the award of compensatory damages is excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →
1996: 11997: 11998: 11999: 12001: 12002: 12004: 12008: 12012: 119962026peak 1996 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Courtney v. City of New York20 F. Supp. 2d 655 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)
  2. Lore v. City of Syracuse670 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2012)
  3. Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory185 F. Supp. 2d 193 (N.D.N.Y. 2002)
  4. Ortiz-Del Valle v. National Basketball Ass'n42 F. Supp. 2d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
  5. Epstein v. Kalvin-Miller International, Inc.139 F. Supp. 2d 469 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)
  6. Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory381 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2004)

Most recent

  1. Lore v. City of Syracuse670 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2012)
  2. Taylor v. New York University Medical Center21 Misc. 3d 23 (2008)
  3. Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory381 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2004)
  4. Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory185 F. Supp. 2d 193 (N.D.N.Y. 2002)
  5. Epstein v. Kalvin-Miller International, Inc.139 F. Supp. 2d 469 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)
  6. Ortiz-Del Valle v. National Basketball Ass'n42 F. Supp. 2d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list