TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Zoll v. Warden of New York City Correctional Facility

The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Zoll, on Behalf of Jack Rotger v. Warden of New York City Correctional Facility

People ex rel. Zoll v. Warden of N.Y. City Corr. Facility, 236 A.D.2d 643 (1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 24, 1997
Citations
236 A.D.2d 643654 N.Y.S.2d 6681997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1589

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

—Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction, or for the detainee’s release pursuant to CPL 30.30 (2) (a) upon Queens County Indictment No. 2973/96.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, either to fix bail in an amount which the detainee can meet or to release the detainee on his own recognizance in accordance with the holding of the Court of Appeals in People ex rel. Chakwin v Warden ( 63 NY2d 120 ), and to fix such other terms and conditions upon the detainee’s release as may seem to it just and proper.

More than 90 days of delay in bringing the detainee to trial on Queens County Indictment No. 2973/96 are chargeable to the prosecution. Since that is the case, CPL 30.30 (2) (a) commands that the detainee must be released on bail which he is capable of meeting or upon his own recognizance (see, People ex rel. Chakwin v Warden, supra). Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1998: 119982026peak 1998 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Simpson v. Sheriff of Dallas County968 S.W.2d 614 (Ark. 1998)

Most recent

  1. Simpson v. Sheriff of Dallas County968 S.W.2d 614 (Ark. 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People ex rel. Chakwin v. Warden, 470 N.E.2d 146 (N.Y. 1984) 38

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list