Hargraves v. Bath Central School District
Lisa Hargraves, Individually and as Parents and Guardians of Carissa Ann Hargraves, an Infant v. Bath Central School District
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the follow *978 ing Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the causes of action seeking compensatory damages for alleged negligent conduct. The court erred, however, in failing to dismiss the cause of action seeking punitive damages. Punitive damages, may not be assessed against defendant Bath Central School District, which is a public corporation (see, Sharapata v Town of Islip, 56 NY2d 332 ; Buck v Hooker Chems. & Plastics Corp., 117 Mise 2d 496). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Purple, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.