TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Simpson

The People of the State of New York v. Lenny Simpson

People v. Simpson, 238 A.D.2d 193 (1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 15, 1997
Citations
238 A.D.2d 193656 N.Y.S.2d 7241997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3964

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Vincent Quattrochi, J.), rendered December 21, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

*194 Since defendant violated every term of his plea agreement, the court properly imposed an enhanced sentence (see, People v Figgins, 87 NY2d 840, 841 ). Defendant’s contention that his guilty plea was involuntary because he was not apprised of the post-plea conditions until after accepting the plea bargain is unpreserved for review, and without merit (see, People v Lewis, 214 AD2d 415 , lv denied 86 NY2d 797 ; People v Ramirez, 210 AD2d 56 , lv denied 84 NY2d 1037 ). The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which was based on conclusory claims of innocence, coercion, and ineffective assistance of counsel (People v Ortiz, 221 AD2d 176 ). Since defendant’s application was without merit, defense counsel’s representation at the motion to withdraw his guilty plea was not ineffective, and the court did not need to appoint new counsel upon defense counsel’s refusal to adopt defendant’s motion (People v Ortiz, supra, at 177 ).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1999: 12000: 12001: 12003: 12004: 12005: 119992026peak 1999 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jesse Hines v. David Miller, Superintendent318 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2003)
  2. Rowe v. Miller299 F. Supp. 2d 231 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
  3. People v. Hines267 A.D.2d 17 (1999)
  4. People v. Loadholt19 A.D.3d 235 (2005)
  5. People v. Rowe271 A.D.2d 218 (2000)
  6. People v. Johnson279 A.D.2d 330 (2001)

Most recent

  1. People v. Loadholt19 A.D.3d 235 (2005)
  2. Rowe v. Miller299 F. Supp. 2d 231 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
  3. Jesse Hines v. David Miller, Superintendent318 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2003)
  4. People v. Johnson279 A.D.2d 330 (2001)
  5. People v. Rowe271 A.D.2d 218 (2000)
  6. People v. Hines267 A.D.2d 17 (1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Ortiz, 221 A.D.2d 176 (1995) 6
People v. Figgins, 661 N.E.2d 156 (N.Y. 1995) 84
People v. Ramirez, 210 A.D.2d 56 (1994) 4
People v. Lewis, 214 A.D.2d 415 (1995) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list