People v. Morales
The People of the State of New York v. Pedro Morales
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lebowitz, J.), rendered April 29, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.
The defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, that he was denied his right to a public trial because the Supreme Court excluded from the courtroom his attorney’s Legal Aid Society supervisor during the testimony of an undercover police officer.
When the defendant’s trial counsel sought to have his supervisor present in the courtroom, the People failed to meet their burden of proving that the supervisor "somehow jeopardized an overriding interest of the undercover police officer”, and the trial court failed to make findings to support that conclusion (People v Bess, 220 AD2d 603, 604 ; People v Mercer, 204 AD2d 741 ). We note that Bess and Mercer were decided well before the trial in this case. The defendant is entitled to a new trial (see, People v Scott, 237 AD2d 544 ). Bracken, J. P., . Rosenblatt, Ritter and Luciano, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.