Yacoub v. Strauss
Joseph Yacoub v. Michael J. Strauss
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for *1000 partial summary judgment on liability because there are issues of fact with respect to the negligence of Michael J. Strauss (defendant) and the comparative negligence of Joseph Yacoub (plaintiff) (see, Hollenbaugh v Frontier Asphalt, 231 AD2d 865 ). Those issues of fact include the speed at which plaintiffs bicycle was traveling and whether defendant’s vision was obscured by a slow-moving vehicle in the oncoming lane. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Summary Judgment.)
Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.