Greene ex rel. S.G. v. Camreta
Sarah GREENE, Personally and as Next Friend for S.G., a Minor, and K.G., a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bob CAMRETA; Deschutes County; James Alford, Deschutes County Sheriff; Bend Lapine School District; Terry Friesen, Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
ORDER In Greene v. Camreta, 588 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir.2009), we affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants Alford and Camreta. In relevant part, we held that Alford and Camreta violated the Fourth Amendment through their warrantless “in-school seizure and interrogation of [S.G.,] a suspected child abuse victim,” given the “direct involvement of law enforcement” in the child abuse investigation.
Id.
at 1030 .
Subsequently, both defendants petitioned for certiorari, seeking review of our Fourth Amendment holding.
See Camreta v. Greene, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2020 , 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated as moot the portion of our opinion addressing the Fourth Amendment issue.
See id.
at 2026 .
Consistent with the Supreme Court’s instructions, we VACATE Section II.A. of our opinion and REMAND for further pro *1202 ceedings consistent with the remainder of the opinion. We DENY Appellant Greene’s motion to file a supplemental brief.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(involving an affidavit and 12 13 “[t]he alleged misrepresentation was ‘material’ to the granting of the removal order if the 14 Juvenile Court would have declined to issue the order had [the defendant] been truthful.”)
-
(the burden rests with the non-governmental party to identify a clearly 15 established law)
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.