Laster v. AT & T MOBILITY LLC
Opinion
663 F.3d 1034 (2011)
Jennifer L. LASTER; Andrew Thompson; Elizabeth Voorhies, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, and
Vincent Concepcion; Liza Concepcion, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
AT & T Mobility LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-56394.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
November 21, 2011.
Matthew B. Butler, Esquire, Craig Nicholas, Nicholas & Butler LLP, Kirk B. Hulett, Sarah P. Weber, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Donald Manwell Falk, Mayer Brown, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Jesse M. Jauregui, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Evan Mark Tager, Archis Ashok Parasharami, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, Michele A. Powers, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1740 , 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.