People v. Castellano
The People of the State of New York v. Peter Castellano
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
—Appeal by the *407 defendant from a judgment of the Supre • ; >>*.. 5, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered February 27 wicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a ; v vehicle in the first degree and criminal possession of stc i iii property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s challenge to the admission of evidence regarding an uncharged crime is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, any error in admitting this evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 ; People v Castro, 261 AD2d 553 ; People v Davis, 259 AD2d 706 ; People v Lunsford, 244 AD2d 507 ).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.