TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

TEKLAY

TEKLAY, 19 I. & N. Dec. 437 (BIA 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Board of Immigration Appeals · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
July 1, 1987
Docket
No. ID 3027
Citations
19 I. & N. Dec. 437
Syllabus
TEKLAY, 19 I&N Dec. 437 (BIA 1987) ID 3027 (PDF) Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals which provided that applications for legalization would have to be "filed within 30 days of the date designated by the Attorney General for the initialacceptance of applications" are clarified to provide that the 30-day filing period is only required as specifically mandated by the Immigration and Naturalization Service's final rules.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

Interim Decision *3027 MATTER OF TEKLAY In Deportation Proceedings A-15175020 Decided by Board May 22, 1987 Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals which provided that applications for legalization would have to be "filed within 30 days of the date designated by the Attorney General for the initial acceptance of applications" are clarified to provide that the 30-day filing period is only required as specifically mandated by the Immi- gration and Naturalization Service's final rules. CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Sec. 241(aX2) [ 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (aX2)]—Nonimmigrant—re- xnained longer than permitted ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: James J. Orlow, Esquire Richard J. Sharkey Orlow, Fuller, Rubin & Steel District Counsel 936 Public Ledger Building 6th and Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106

BY: Milhollan, Chairman; Dunne, Morris, Vacca, and Heilman, Board Members On March 27, 1957, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, the proceedings on appeal in this case were ordered continued. indefi- nitely without further action by the Board of Immigration Appeals pending the respondent's opportunity to apply and be considered for legalisation under the provisions of section 201 of the Immigra- tion Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-603, 100 Stat 3359, 3394. The March 27, 1987, order will be further considered and clarified on our own motion. The March 27, 1987, order preceded the issuance by the Immigra- tion and Naturalization Service of the final rules governing appli- cations for legalization. The order provided that any application would have to be "submitted pursuant to the regulations to be pub- lished regarding applications for legalization." It was also stated that the application would have to be "filed within 30 days of the 437 Interim Decision #3027

date designated by the Attorney General for the initial acceptance of applications." This latter provision was intended to be caution- ary le., to guard against the possibility that a 30-day filing require- ment would be imposed and the alien not become aware of this sig- nificant time restriction. The Service has now promulgated the final rules regarding appli- cations for legalization. See 52 Fed.. Reg. 16, 205-216 (1987) (to be codified at 8 C.F.R. § 245a). The regulations do not require aliens, such as the respondent, who were either apprehended by the Serv- ice before November 6, 1986, or were the subject of Orders to Show Cause issued before November 6, 1986, to file applications for legal- ization within 30 days of May 5, 19E7, the date designated for the initial acceptance of such applications. Accordingly, our March 27, 1987, order in this case, and all other Board orders in which this 30-day filing period was referenced, are clarified to provide that the Service regulations govern applications for legalization. The appli- cation period set forth in the regulations is controlling and the filing of an application within 30 days is only required as specifical- ly mandated by the regulations. See 13 C.F.R. § 245a.2 (1988). ORDER: On reconsideration, the Board's March 27, 1987, order is reinstated as clarified herein.

438

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1998: 219982026peak 1998 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Y-B21 I. & N. Dec. 1136 (BIA 1998)
  2. COLLADO21 I. & N. Dec. 1061 (BIA 1998)

Most recent

  1. Y-B21 I. & N. Dec. 1136 (BIA 1998)
  2. COLLADO21 I. & N. Dec. 1061 (BIA 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list