TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Estate of Foster

Matter of the Estate of John S. Foster

In re the Estate of Foster, 16 Mills Surr. 183 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1916)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Surrogate's Court · State Specialty Courts
Decided
January 15, 1916
Judges
Fowler
Citations
16 Mills Surr. 18393 Misc. 400156 N.Y.S. 1005
Headnotes
Dower—When widow not entitled to—Gift of life estate in real estate—Authorization to executors and trustees to mortgage. Where testator gave his wife a life estate in all his real estate after payment of taxes, insurance and repairs and authorized his executors and trustees to mortgage said real estate in certain contingencies, the widow is not entitled to dower therein.
Summary
Appeal from an order fixing the transfer tax.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Fowler

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Fowler, S.

—The executors of decedent’s estate contend that his widow is entitled to dower in addition to the provisions contained in the will for her benefit. The transfer tax appraiser refused to deduct the value of the widow’s dower from the assets of the estate, and the executors have appealed from the order entered upon his report. The decedent gave his wife a life estate in all his real estate after the payment of taxes, insurance and repairs. His executors and trustees were also authorized to mortgage the real estate in certain contingencies. The courts have held that when a testator gives all his real estate in trust and the trustee has power to insure the property, to make repairs or to mortgage it, such control over the real estate is inconsistent with the right of the widow to one-third of it during her life. (Asche v. Asche, 113 N. Y. 232 ; Matter of Gordon, 172 id. 28.) I have had occasion on a recent case (Matter of Gale, 83 Misc. Rep. 687 ) to examine this question at some length, and the reasons given for my conclusion in that case apply with equal force to the matter now under consideration.- I will therefore hold that the widow is not entitled to dower in addition to the provision made for her in the will of the testator. Order fixing tax affirmed.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Walsh126 Misc. 479 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1926)

Most recent

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Walsh126 Misc. 479 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Asche v. Asche, 21 N.E. 70 (N.Y. 1889) 48

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list