TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Estate of Hickey

Matter of the Estate of Leo B. Hickey

In re the Estate of Hickey, 113 Misc. 261 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Surrogate's Court · State Specialty Courts
Decided
October 15, 1920
Judges
Foley
Citations
113 Misc. 261
Headnotes
Wills — nuncupative — letters of soldier in active service granted probate — Code Civ. Pro. § 2611. Where proof showing testamentary capacity and apprehension of death is corroborated by two witnesses as required by section 2611 of the Code of Civil Procedure, such portions of two letters written by one while in the active military service of the United States in the recent war, and relating to the distribution of his personal property, will be admitted to probate as his last will.
Summary
Proceedings upon the probate of a nuncupative will of a soldier.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Foley

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Foley, S.

The proponent offers for probate portions of two letters from the deceased — a soldier — as his will of personal property. These letters were written by him while in active service in the United States army in the recent war. They are dated May 26, 1918, and August 6, 1918. One of the letters was written from a hospital in which he was a patient. He died October 20, 1918. The deceased had applied for war risk insurance and in his application he endeavored to make his sister, an infant, the beneficiary of the policy. It further appears he was informed that this could not be done because of her infancy. The policy was therefore made payable to his estate. Decedent stated in one of his letters, “ Did you ever receive my insurance policy from the government? I tried to make it payable to you, but they said it would have to be one of my parents or brother or sister over twenty-one, so I had to make it out to myself, but Sis will get the money if anything does happen to me.” In the other letter he states, “ My insurance is. made out to Nan,” referring to his only sister Anna. The formalities required by law for the execution of a will were not complied with, but the directions in the letters must be regarded as a legal will under section 16 of *263 the Decedent Estate Law, which provides: “ No nuncupative or unwritten will, bequeathing personal estate shall be valid, unless made by a soldier while in actual military service, or by a mariner, while at sea. ’ ’ A case almost similar in circumstances is to be found in Botsford v. Krake, 1 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 112, where an officer of the United States army in May, 1864, wrote and sent a letter to his sister stating that if he was killed or did not return he wanted her to have his property. The letter was there admitted to probate as a valid will. The theory of the law is that, from the absolute necessities of military service, the solemn and formal rules as to testaments are relaxed in favor of soldiers. Hubbard v. Hubbard, 8 N. Y. 196 ; Matter of O’Connor, 65 Misc. Rep. 403 . The proof shows capacity animus testandi, apprehension of death and the corroboration by two witnesses required under section 2611 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The portions of the letters relating to the disposition of decedent’s property are admitted to probate.

Decreed accordingly.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1923: 11926: 11929: 11935: 11945: 119232026peak 1923 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Mason121 Misc. 142 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1923)
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Miller134 Misc. 671 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1929)
  3. United Services Life Ins. v. Farr60 F. Supp. 829 (S.D.N.Y. 1945)
  4. Morgan v. United States13 F.2d 763 (4th Cir. 1926)
  5. McNelis' Estate22 Pa. D. & C. 486 (1935)

Most recent

  1. United Services Life Ins. v. Farr60 F. Supp. 829 (S.D.N.Y. 1945)
  2. McNelis' Estate22 Pa. D. & C. 486 (1935)
  3. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Miller134 Misc. 671 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1929)
  4. Morgan v. United States13 F.2d 763 (4th Cir. 1926)
  5. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Mason121 Misc. 142 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Hubbard v. Hubbard, 8 N.Y. 196 (1853) 8
In re the Probate of the Nuncupative Will of O'Connor, 7 Mills Surr. 319 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1909) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list