TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Estate of Grinnell

Matter of the Estate of Mary M. Grinnell

In re the Estate of Grinnell, 115 Misc. 722 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Surrogate's Court · State Specialty Courts
Decided
January 15, 1921
Judges
Foley
Citations
115 Misc. 722
Headnotes
Executors and administrators — accounting — specific legacy — when legatee entitled to legacy with accrued income from the time the will takes effect.
Summary
Proceeding upon the accounting of an executor. ■

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Foley

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Foley, S.

William G. Landon and Harold M. Landon are entitled to a one-fourth part of the cash and securities mentioned in the will on deposit in the Guaranty Trust Company with the accrued income thereon. The legacy to them was specific. Crawford v. McCarthy, 159 N. Y. 514 ; Matter of Matthews, 122 App. Div. 605 . The death of one of the life tenants before the testator had no effect on the estate in remainder except to entitle the remaindermen to actual possession of the property as soon as the will took effect. Campbell v. Rawdon, 18 N. Y. 412, 421 ; Utica Trust & Deposit Co. v. Thompson, 87 Misc. Rep. 31 . Moreover, regardless of the nature of the legacy, the plain language of the will requires an equal division of income and principal in four shares. The rule, therefore, that general legacies bear interest from a date one year after the granting of letters has no application to. this estate. Matter of Stanfield, 135 N. Y. 292, 294 ; Matter of Parkin, 190 App. Div. 875, 877 . Artificial and technical rules cannot annul the clearly expressed intention of the testatrix. In paragraph 4 of her will she provided that upon the death of the mother of the Landon children it was her intention that “ equality should be established between my four children mentioned in this will.” Although in her codicil she subsequently revoked the provision for an increased share of the income to Mrs. Landon, this declaration of equality survived and was reiterated in the codicil in her declaration that “ it is my intention that all cash and securities mentioned in my will as being on deposit at the Morton Trust Company (the predecessor of the Guaranty Trust Company) shall be divided equally among my children.” Mr. *724 Surrogate Fowler, in his decision construing the will, has given effect to this declaration of equality. The proposed distribution of income set forth in the account creates inequality and is neither fair nor just. The amount of income due the Landon children will be the proportionate share of the total income earned on the entire fund, which has been averaged at five and eight one-hundredths per cent.

Decreed accordingly.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11929: 11938: 11958: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Transfer Tax on the Estate of Brooks119 Misc. 738 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1922)
  2. In re the Estate of Mattes12 Misc. 2d 502 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1958)
  3. Herdman v. Boardman276 P. 394 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  4. In re the Estate of Aman168 Misc. 471 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)

Most recent

  1. In re the Estate of Mattes12 Misc. 2d 502 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1958)
  2. In re the Estate of Aman168 Misc. 471 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)
  3. Herdman v. Boardman276 P. 394 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  4. In re the Transfer Tax on the Estate of Brooks119 Misc. 738 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1922)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Crawford v. McCarthy, 54 N.E. 277 (N.Y. 1899) 104
In re Stanfield, 31 N.E. 1013 (N.Y. 1892) 75
Campbell v. Rawdon, 18 N.Y. 412 (1858) 38
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Matthews, 122 A.D. 605 (1907) 24
Utica Trust & Deposit Co. v. Thomson, 87 Misc. 31 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1914) 9
In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Parkin, 190 A.D. 875 (1920) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list