TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Estate of Knight

In the Matter of the Estate of James P. Knight

In re the Estate of Knight, 124 Misc. 430 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Surrogate's Court · State Specialty Courts
Decided
October 28, 1924
Judges
Foley
Citations
124 Misc. 430208 N.Y.S. 8221924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1116

Opinion of the Court — Foley

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Foley, S.:

In this accounting proceeding three questions are raised as to the allowance of commissions to the trustees. They involve the construction and effect of the amendment to section 285 of the Surrogate’s Court Act made by chapter 649 of the Laws of 1923. The material language of the amendment reads as follows: “ Where a trustee or executor is, by the terms of the instrument, required to collect the rents and manage real property, he shall be allowed and may retain, five per centum of the rents collected therefrom, in addition to the commissions herein provided.”

(1) I hold that the terms of the will required the trustees to collect the rents and manage the real property, and entitled them, subject to the limitation of amounts hereafter made by me, to the additional commissions.

(2) The beneficiary and creditor of the estate objects to the additional allowance of five per cent on certain rents. The particular parcel of real property was leased for twenty-one years with options of renewal. According to the terms of the lease, the lessees are to pay in addition to the rental, all taxes and other charges. They have erected on the premises a theatre. It will be noted that the Legislature by the amendment to section 285 of the Surrogate’s Court Act did not provide for an additional allowance for the mere collection of rents, but also required as a basis for extra compensation the management of the real property. By the same amendment the regular commissions of a trustee were substantially increased and the rate of the graded commissions on the larger amounts was fixed at two per cent. In Matter of Althause ( 122 Misc. 279 ) I held that where an agent has been employed to assist in the collection and management, his charge must be deducted from the additional commissions allowed the trustee. In my opinion a fair construction of the intent of the Legislature was that the trustee must, in order to become entitled to extra compensation, actively superintend or control the real property. The word *432 “ manage ” implies the supervision, maintenance and care of the premises, the making of necessary repairs, the payment of taxes and water rents. No one of these duties was required to be assumed by the trustees of this estate with reference to the lease of the property in question. Their responsibility is now limited to the collection of the rents, and the regular commission of two per cent furnishes ample payment for these services. Additional commissions cannot, therefore, be allowed to the trustees on the amounts in dispute.

(3) As to the rents collected prior to the malting of the lease, the additional commission of five per cent, less the charges of the real estate agent, will be allowed to the active trustee.

Correct the decree in accordance with this decision and resubmit the same for signature.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 11959: 11960: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Arnolt127 Misc. 579 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1926)
  2. Spence v. Niper22 Misc. 2d 840 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)
  3. In re the Accounting of Turner25 Misc. 2d 515 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1960)

Most recent

  1. In re the Accounting of Turner25 Misc. 2d 515 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1960)
  2. Spence v. Niper22 Misc. 2d 840 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Arnolt127 Misc. 579 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re the Estate of Althause, 122 Misc. 279 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1924) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list