In re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Law of the Estate of Kerr
In the Matter of the Appraisal under the Transfer Tax Law of the Estate of George Kerr, Late of the City of Yonkers, N. Y.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Slater, S.
The question involved in this matter relates to the value of shares of closely held stock in the corporation of Folwell Brother & Company of Philadelphia. The State Tax Commission has appraised 400 shares of the value per share of $219.89. The executors contend the fair market value is $165 , per share, based upon sales. The State contends that the cases of Matter of Dupignac ( 123 Misc. 21 , opinion by this court; affd., 211 App. Div. 862 ) and Matter of Jackson (by Surrogate Foley, 125 Misc. 787 ) support their theory of appraisement on actual value from the financial statements of the company. There is a difference between the instant case and the cases cited by the State Tax- Commission. In the Dupignac case no sales had been made, and of course, none were considered. Ample evidence was taken to permit the court to ascertain the value of the good will, as well as the value of the stock. Such testimony has not been offered in the instant case,, In Matter of Jackson there was a great divergence between the appraised value at $299.21 per share and actual sales, which were made at the rate of $100 per share, showing evidently that they were cash sales, or made only for purpose of transferring the title. In the instant case actual sales are referred to during the year 1924 and in the year 1926 after the decedent’s death. In 1924' stock was sold at $160 per share. In 1926, after the decedent’s death, it sold for $145 per share. These sales were made in the course of settling two estates. There is not a wide difference in range of value between $165 per share and the appraised value of $219.89, indicating that the actual sales at $165 was possibly the fair market value on a narrow market. Without these sales, and following my opinion in Matter of Dupignac (supra), I would necessarily have to find the value of the stock as the actual value. But, even to do that, no testimony has been' offered, except as may be found in the report of the appraiser and that fails to indicate how the appraiser arrived at the value of good will.
*355 Consequently, I feel with proof of actual sales that I might very well decide this matter by reducing the value of the shares of stock and appraise them at $175 per share.
An order may be entered in accordance with this memorandum.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.