Marty v. Roberts
———— Marty v. ———— Roberts
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Steuer, J.
Motion to confirm referee’s report granted. Upon confirmation the judgment entered herein December 13, 1932, is vacated and the complaint dismissed. Because of the failure to *333 have a guardian ad litem appointed for the infant defendant no jurisdiction was acquired. Jurisdiction could not be acquired in this action by the infant’s coining of age. The situation involving an infant plaintiff is altogether different, as then the failure to appoint is only an irregularity. Plaintiff’s remedy is to start a new action and to apply to the discretion of the court for a preference. Order signed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.