TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Terzani

The People of the State of New York v. Athos Terzani

People v. Terzani, 149 Misc. 818 (1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York County Courts · State Trial Courts
Decided
November 20, 1933
Judges
Kadien
Citations
149 Misc. 818269 N.Y.S. 6201933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1782

Opinion of the Court — Kadien

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Kadien, J.

The indictment charges the defendant with the crime of murder in the second degree, alleged to have been committed by him by discharging a bullet into the body of Anthony Fierro from a twenty-five-calibre Colt pistol bearing the number 200511.

The defendant now seeks an order directing the district attorney to furnish and deliver to him photographs of all fingerprints found on the aforesaid pistol. The alleged facts set forth in defendant’s moving affidavit are most unusual. It appears therefrom that the defendant with many others attended a meeting at which the defendant actually saw another fire the shot that killed the deceased; that he made complaint thereof and immediately pointed out the place of concealment of the pistol.

The district attorney urges in -opposition to the motion that the application is an attempt to compel the prosecution to divulge its evidence.

The motion assumes that fingerprint impressions were obtained from the pistol, but the People have neither denied nor admitted such to be the case. The court has no knowledge as to whether such prints exist. If fingerprint impressions were obtained from the pistol, they will be a decisive factor in determining the question as to who fired the shot that killed the deceased.

*819 In view of the situation presented by defendant’s contention, I cannot agree with the grounds urged in opposition to the motion.

The defendant is entitled to the benefit of any reasonable opportunity to prepare his defense and to prove his innocence. Justice demands that this application be granted.

Motion granted. Submit order providing for the furnishing of such prints within two days after the service of a copy of order with notice of entry on the district attorney.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11960: 11964: 21965: 11967: 11973: 119382026peak 1964 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Carothers24 Misc. 2d 734 (1960)
  2. People v. Gatti167 Misc. 545 (1938)
  3. People v. Miller42 Misc. 2d 794 (1964)
  4. People v. Powell49 Misc. 2d 624 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1965)
  5. People v. Collins75 Misc. 2d 535 (1973)
  6. People v. Bradford54 Misc. 2d 54 (1967)

Most recent

  1. People v. Collins75 Misc. 2d 535 (1973)
  2. People v. Bradford54 Misc. 2d 54 (1967)
  3. People v. Powell49 Misc. 2d 624 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1965)
  4. People v. Miller42 Misc. 2d 794 (1964)
  5. People v. Roldan42 Misc. 2d 501 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1964)
  6. People v. Carothers24 Misc. 2d 734 (1960)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list