TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sacks v. Ventura

Paul Sacks, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Metro Sacks Company v. Frances Ventura and Others

Sacks v. Ventura, 156 Misc. 656 (1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
City of New York Municipal Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
August 31, 1935
Judges
Bernstein
Citations
156 Misc. 656282 N.Y.S. 8211935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1488

Opinion of the Court — Bernstein

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bernstein, J.

Motion to strike out the separate and distinct defense contained in the defendants’ answer is granted on the ground that the plaintiff’s claim arises by reason of section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, which section creates a statutory right as distinguished from the common-law remedy for personal injuries due to negligence, and the six-year Statute of Limitations, as provided by section 48 of the Civil Practice Act, applies rather than the three-year Statute of Limitations, as provided in section 49 of the Civil Practice Act.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1949: 119492026peak 1949 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Janes v. Sackman Bros. Co.177 F.2d 928 (2d Cir. 1949)

Most recent

  1. Janes v. Sackman Bros. Co.177 F.2d 928 (2d Cir. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list