TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Accounting of Weaver

In the Matter of the Accounting of Gladys Weaver, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert W. Weaver

In re the Accounting of Weaver, 195 Misc. 405 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Surrogate's Court · State Specialty Courts
Decided
May 31, 1949
Judges
McGarey
Citations
195 Misc. 40590 N.Y.S.2d 7701949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2486

Opinion of the Court — McGarey

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

McGarey, S.

In this accounting proceeding pursuant to section 252 of the Surrogate’s Court Act there is presented the question as to whether the distribution of the damages recovered for the wrongful death of decedent is to be made under the statute in effect at the date of his death or pursuant to the amendment of section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law, by chapter 639 of the Laws of 1949, effective April 16, 1949.

The note of the Law Revision Commission appended to the amended statute states that the purpose of the amendment is to change the rule so as to provide for distribution of the recovery in proportion to the pecuniary damages suffered by the surviving spouse and next of kin.

The decedent herein died May 12, 1947, as the result of injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident. The decedent is survived by a widow and three infant children.

The amendment is not retroactive. The right of recovery by the widow and next of kin for injuries resulting in death is in *406 the nature o£ a property right and becomes vested immediately upon the death of the injured party. (Pitkin v. New York Central & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co., 94 App. Div. 31 , 109 App. Div. 911 , affd. 185 N. Y. 548 , approved Sider v. General Elec. Co., 238 N. Y. 64 .)

In Matter of Brennan ( 160 App. Div. 401, 410 ) it was held that this right was immune from legislative attack by a statute passed intermediate such death and the date of distribution.

The court, therefore, determines that the distribution in this estate will be made in accordance with the law in effect as of the date of decedent’s death.

Proceed accordingly.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 11958: 11974: 11978: 11989: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McKibben v. Mallory293 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1974)
  2. In re Estate of Parsons272 N.W.2d 16 (Iowa 1978)
  3. Dance v. Martelli147 N.E.2d 385 (Ill. App. Ct. 1958)
  4. In re the Accounting of Kaiser198 Misc. 582 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1950)
  5. In re the Estate of Dominguez143 Misc. 2d 1010 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1989)

Most recent

  1. In re the Estate of Dominguez143 Misc. 2d 1010 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1989)
  2. In re Estate of Parsons272 N.W.2d 16 (Iowa 1978)
  3. McKibben v. Mallory293 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1974)
  4. Dance v. Martelli147 N.E.2d 385 (Ill. App. Ct. 1958)
  5. In re the Accounting of Kaiser198 Misc. 582 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Sider v. Gen. Elec. Co., 143 N.E. 792 (N.Y. 1924) 38
Pitkin v. N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River R.R., 94 A.D. 31 (1904) 24
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Brennan, 160 A.D. 401 (1914) 13
Pitkin v. N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River Rail. Co., 77 N.E. 1195 (N.Y. 1906) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list