TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Accounting of Liebovitz

In the Matter of the Accounting of Abraham L. Liebovitz, as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Fanny Liebovitz

In re the Accounting of Liebovitz, 197 Misc. 123 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Surrogate's Court · State Specialty Courts
Decided
October 28, 1949
Judges
Collins
Citations
197 Misc. 12394 N.Y.S.2d 301949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3270

Opinion of the Court — Collins

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Collins, S.

The special guardian representing infant remaindermen of testamentary trusts has interposed an objection to the account of the executors upon the ground that a portion of the estate taxes should be allocated against an inter vivos trust which was required to be included in the gross estate for the purpose of computing such taxes. The provisions of section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law, with respect to apportionment of the tax burden are controlling in the absence of an unequivocal direction in the will to the contrary. (Matter of Mills, 189 Misc. 136 , affd. 272 App. Div. 229 , affd. 297 N. Y. 1012 .) The pertinent text of decedent’s will reads: “ I direct *124 that all legacies and bequests, whether the same are made absolutely or in trust, are to be free of any legacy, succession or inheritance tax, and that every such tax shall be paid out of the principal of my estate.” It is apparent that the direction for the payment of taxes from the “ principal ” of the estate is limited explicitly to an exoneration of the “ legacies and bequests ” contained in the will. (Matter of Ryan, 178 Misc. 1007 , affd. 265 App. Div. 1051 , leave to appeal denied, 290 N. Y. 933 ; Matter of Mills, supra; Matter of Owen, 193 Misc. 144 ; Matter of Corlies, 174 Misc. 459 .) Decedent’s will does not contain unambiguous language dispensing entirely with tax apportionment and there is omitted from the tax clause of the will any reference to gifts or transfers of property made during decedent’s lifetime. There is no intimation that decedent intended to confer an exemption upon the recipients of inter vivos benefits. The quoted text of the will relates solely to the benefits passing under that instrument. The single thought expressed is that the share of the tax which ordinarily would be borne by the persons benefiting under the will is to be imposed upon the principal of the estate. The will not only lacks the clear and definite direction with respect to property passing outside the will which is essential to avoid the operation of the statutory rule but it fails even by implication to allude to such property or the tax imposed in respect thereof.

The objection of the special guardian is sustained. The accounting parties are directed to supplement their account with-a schedule of the apportionment of estate taxes in respect of the inter vivos trust. Thereafter a decree may be submitted on notice settling the account.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1953: 21956: 119532026peak 1953 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Accounting of Becher204 Misc. 523 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1953)
  2. In re the Construction of the Will of Paine7 Misc. 2d 795 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1956)
  3. In re the Accounting of Gross204 Misc. 804 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1953)

Most recent

  1. In re the Construction of the Will of Paine7 Misc. 2d 795 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1956)
  2. In re the Accounting of Gross204 Misc. 804 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1953)
  3. In re the Accounting of Becher204 Misc. 523 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
In re the Accounting of Phipps, 80 N.E.2d 535 (N.Y. 1948) 71
In re the Accounting of Phipps, 189 Misc. 136 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1946) 67
In re the Estate of Ryan, 178 Misc. 1007 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1942) 27
In re the Estate of Corlies, 174 Misc. 459 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1940) 10
In re the Accounting of Metzger, 193 Misc. 144 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1948) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list