TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Accounting of Geffen

In the Matter of the Accounting of Isidor Geffen, as Administrator of the Estate of Rose Geffen

In re the Accounting of Geffen, 199 Misc. 756 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Surrogate's Court · State Specialty Courts
Decided
May 22, 1951
Judges
Henderson
Citations
199 Misc. 756104 N.Y.S.2d 4901951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1765

Opinion of the Court — Henderson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Henderson, S.

The court is satisfied that the distributee, Chaye Gall, is the person mentioned in the foreign death certificate.

This application for the withdrawal of certain moneys on deposit with the city treasurer will be granted as to the share of the applicant, Jochelis Galas, a resident of England.

With respect to the share of Yocha Galas, a resident of Lithuania, no withdrawal will be ordered.

Since February 19, 1951, the United States Government through the action of its Treasury Department in concurrence with the State Department has suspended all types of compensation and pension payments to beneficiaries in countries behind the so-called “ Iron Curtain.” The area in Germany under the control of Soviet Russia is also affected by this action.

*757 TMs cessation of payments was ordered because “ there is not a reasonable assurance that a payee in those areas will actually receive checks or warrants drawn against funds of the United States * * * and be able to negotiate the same for full value.” (Code of Fed. Beg., tit. 31, § 211.3, subd. [a], as amd.; 16 Federal Begister 1818.)

Accordingly the request for a payment of the share of the said Yocha Galas will be denied (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 269).

Submit order.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1951: 41952: 31953: 21963: 11965: 11966: 219512026peak 1951 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State Land Board v. Pekarek378 P.2d 735 (Or. 1963)
  2. In re the Estate of Draganoff46 Misc. 2d 167 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1965)
  3. In re the Accounting of Green111 N.E.2d 424 (N.Y. 1953)
  4. In re the Accounting of Best200 Misc. 332 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1951)
  5. In re the Accounting of Mulligan200 Misc. 499 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1951)
  6. In re the Accounting of Aronson202 Misc. 244 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1952)

Most recent

  1. In re the Estate of Borok49 Misc. 2d 870 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1966)
  2. First National Bank of Cincinnati v. Fishman217 N.E.2d 60 (Oh. Prob. Ct., Hamilton 1966)
  3. In re the Estate of Draganoff46 Misc. 2d 167 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1965)
  4. State Land Board v. Pekarek378 P.2d 735 (Or. 1963)
  5. In re the Accounting of Dobo204 Misc. 975 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1953)
  6. In re the Accounting of Green111 N.E.2d 424 (N.Y. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list