Ross v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.
In the Matter of the Application of Louis Ross, against Hardware Mutual Casualty Company of Stevens Point, Wisconsin
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Walter, R. Hart, J.
The provision in the policy for an appraisal of the injuries suffered by petitioners does not constitute an agreement to arbitrate all disputes arising under the contract of insurance. Since the respondent contests the allegations of the petition that all conditions precedent have been complied with, it would not be within the province of the appraisers to resolve that question. An agreement for appraisal as an incident to a contract is not a basis for an arbitration proceeding within section 1448 of the Civil Practice Act. (Matter of Delmar Box Co. [Ætna Ins. Co.], 309 N. Y. 60 .)
While the contract of insurance would appear to define an ‘ uninsured automobile ’ ’ as one ‘ with respect to the * * * use of which there is no bodily injury liability insurance applicable at the time of the accident, or an automobile used without the permission of the owner ” (emphasis supplied), it has not been established on this record as a fact that such driver was not insured. The circumstance that he defaulted in an action brought against him in Utah does not create a presumption that he was uninsured. Since the contract does not provide that the appraisers may resolve this issue of fact or any other issue respecting respondent’s liability under the policy, no resort to arbitration may be had. As expressed in Matter of Delmar Box Co. [Ætna Ins. Co.] (supra, p. 63): “ An agreement for arbitration ordinarily encompasses the disposition of the entire controversy between the parties, upon which judgment may be entered after judicial confirmation of the arbitration award (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1464), while the agreement for appraisal extends merely to the resolution of the specific issues of * * * the amount of loss, all other issues being reserved for determination in a plenary action.”
Accordingly, the motion to compel respondent to proceed to an appraisal is denied without prejudice to such plenary suit as petitioners may be advised.
Submit order.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Matlock
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Gottsponer
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Travelers Insurance
- In re the Arbitration between American National Fire Insurance & McCormack
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. Wildman
- In re the Arbitration between Lowe & Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.
Most recent
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Matlock
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Gottsponer
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Mahoney
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Travelers Insurance
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Morey
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Herrington
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.