TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Blumenreich Properties, Inc. v. Waters

In the Matter of Blumenreich Properties, Inc., against Louis N. Waters, Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay

Blumenreich Props., Inc. v. Waters, 14 Misc. 2d 947 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
November 19, 1957
Judges
Johnson
Citations
14 Misc. 2d 947178 N.Y.S.2d 9051957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2154

Opinion of the Court — Johnson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

, Cortland A. Johnson, J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, whereby petitioner seeks to review a refusal by the Oyster Bay Town Board of petitioner’s application to "install a public garage and gasoline filling station on premises at Merrick Road and Glen Road, Massapequa. The property involved is in an “ F ” Business District, wherein the use sought is a permitted use, when allowed by the Town Board after a public hearing. Such a hearing was held upon petitioner’s application. Three reasons were stated by the Town Board for the denial of the application. The first, that there are a sufficient number of gasoline stations nearby to serve the needs of residents in the vicinity, is not, in the court’s opinion, a valid ground for determining questions of this character. The purpose of zoning is not to serve as a control of business competition. The second, that the use of the property for this purpose "would tend to have an adverse effect upon nearby properties has no support in the record. The third ground, that petitioner has failed.to sustain a burden of demonstrating that the proposed use will not adversely affect the comfort, health, welfare and safety of the town, or that it would be in harmony with and promote the general purpose and intent of the Building Zone Ordinance, attempts, as the court reads this record, to impose upon the petitioner a burden greater than the ordinance requires, and further constitutes a determination not supported by the record.

For all these reasons, the determination is, in the legal sense, arbitrary and capricious, and must be annulled. Unless a further hearing is necessary to enable the board to impose reasonable conditions, petitioner is entitled to an order granting the relief sought.

Proceed on notice accordingly.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 21959: 11960: 11977: 119582026peak 1958 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Technical & Professional Services, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Jackson County558 S.W.2d 798 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
  2. Bar Harbour Shopping Center, Inc. v. Andrews23 Misc. 2d 894 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)
  3. Lawfred Realty Service Corp. v. Waters15 Misc. 2d 113 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)
  4. Fucigna v. Sahm15 Misc. 2d 304 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)
  5. St. Nicholas Russian Orthodox Church v. Murdock25 Misc. 2d 380 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)

Most recent

  1. Technical & Professional Services, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Jackson County558 S.W.2d 798 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
  2. St. Nicholas Russian Orthodox Church v. Murdock25 Misc. 2d 380 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)
  3. Bar Harbour Shopping Center, Inc. v. Andrews23 Misc. 2d 894 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)
  4. Fucigna v. Sahm15 Misc. 2d 304 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)
  5. Lawfred Realty Service Corp. v. Waters15 Misc. 2d 113 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list