Lewis v. Clothes Shack, Inc.
Anita Lewis v. Clothes Shack, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This case is distinguishable from First Nat. Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Center (21 N Y 2d 630). While the Yellowstone lease provided that landlord could, after the expiration of 10 days after notice to cure default, serve a notice declaring the term ended, the lease in this case provides that landlord may, after the expiration of five days after notice to cure default, “ serve a written three (3) days’ notice of cancellation of this lease upon tenant, and upon the expiration of said three (3) days, this lease and the term thereunder shall end ”.
Thus, while the Yellowstone lease was terminated in accordance with its terms at the moment when landlord served its notice and could not thereafter be revived by the court, here the lease could be terminated in accordance with its terms only upon the expiration of a proper three days’ notice of cancellation given to the tenant.
Landlord sent such three days ’ notice of cancellation by certified mail on Friday, October 24,1969, evidently allowing one day for mailing in fixing October 28,1969 therein as the date of termination. However, it was not delivered to tenant until Monday, October 27, 1969, thereby making the close of October 30, 1969 the effective time of termination. Prior to that time, i.e., in the morning of October 30, 1969, tenant cured the default. There was, then, no existing basis for cancellation at the effective time the lease could be declared terminated in accordance with its terms.
This conclusion is a reasonable and practical interpretation under the circumstances of this case of the provision for a written three days ’ notice of cancellation following a five days ’ notice of default, giving tenant a last chance to cure the default or suffer accelerated termination of the lease, and is also consistent with the negotiations concerning the manner of curing the default, which tenant was conducting with landlord right up to the very end while landlord’s attorneys were sending the notices on her behalf.
*623 Moreover, since the notice declared cancellation on a date less than three days after receipt of the notice, it was ineffective to operate as a cancellation (98 Delancey St. Corp. v. Barocas, 82 N. Y. S. 2d 802, affd. 275 App. Div. 651 ).
The final judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment directed in favor of tenant dismissing the petition with costs.
Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Steeit and Gold, J'J.
Pinal judgment reversed, etc.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“all the acts of the landlord in this case indicate an intention to enforce the lease provision”; “Throughout the landlord insisted that the tenant cure the violation”)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →- Federal District Courts1
- Bankruptcy Courts3
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts4
- State Trial Courts1
- State Specialty Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
- 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. v. Rockefeller Center, Inc. (In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc.)
- In re Delta Motor Hotel of Syracuse, Inc.
- ATM One v. Landaverde
- Howard Town Center Developer, LLC v. Howard University
- 1535 Chestnut Corp. v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co. (In re Horn & Hardart Baking Co.)
- Mart v. Mart
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.