TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Society of New York Hospital v. Mogensen

Society of the New York Hospital v. Paul Mogensen, and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Jack R. Goldberg, as Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the City of New York, Third-Party

Soc'y of N.Y. Hosp. v. Mogensen, 83 Misc. 2d 840 (1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 13, 1972
Citations
83 Misc. 2d 840373 N.Y.S.2d 7221972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2335

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Since plaintiff failed to serve an amended complaint asserting a claim against the third-party defendant, as permitted by CPLR 1009, the latter, if liable at all, is liable only to the defendant who impleaded him, and it was, therefore, error to award judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against him (3 Carmody-Wait 2d, N.Y. Practice, § 19:96; Bozzuffi v Darrieusecq, 125 Misc 178 ). This record does not permit an amendment of the judgment so as to grant judgment against the defendant and in turn in his favor against the appellant (cf. Otis Elevator Co. v Miller, 127 Misc 421 ), since issues were raised precluding a summary disposition, the plaintiff has not appealed, and the question of the defendant’s liability to the plaintiff is therefore not presented for review. Nor may the third-party complaint be dismissed as a matter *842 of law for untimeliness, since no provision of the law limits the time of a recipient to file a claim and the third-party defendant’s right to reimbursement has not been foreclosed (see 18 NYCRR 83.9[c], made applicable to medical assistance claims, 18 NYCRR 85.9).

Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed with $10 costs; order, to the extent appealed from, modified by denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and affirming so much thereof as denied the motion to dismiss the third-party complaint.

Concur — Quinn, P. J., Lupiano and Markowitz, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 11980: 11991: 11993: 119762026peak 1976 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Magnant v. Ambulatory Renal Services, Inc.575 N.E.2d 1029 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991)
  2. Leon v. J & M Peppe Realty Corp.190 A.D.2d 400 (1993)
  3. Amsterdam Memorial Hospital v. Cintron52 A.D.2d 404 (1976)
  4. Caraballo v. Santiago103 Misc. 2d 156 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Leon v. J & M Peppe Realty Corp.190 A.D.2d 400 (1993)
  2. Magnant v. Ambulatory Renal Services, Inc.575 N.E.2d 1029 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991)
  3. Caraballo v. Santiago103 Misc. 2d 156 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1980)
  4. Amsterdam Memorial Hospital v. Cintron52 A.D.2d 404 (1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Bozzuffi v. Darrieusecq, 125 Misc. 178 (1925) 8
Otis Elevator Co. v. Miller, 127 Misc. 421 (1926) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list