TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stehley v. Irvin

Stehley v. Irvin, 8 Pa. 500 (1848)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1848
Judges
Burnside
Citations
8 Pa. 500
Headnotes
Vendee of land may deduct from the amount of Ms purchase-money the value of an easement existing at the time of his conveyance — but which had been destroyed by a subsequent grant by his vendor to a purchaser without notice.
Summary
In error from the Common Pleas of Centre county. Weaver, being the owner of a mill and tavern, constructed a pipe to convey water to the latter through his own land. While this easement was in use he conveyed the tavern to Bottorf. Weaver then conveyed the mill property to Irvin, without a reservation of this easement. ' At the time of this conveyance Irvin had no notice of the easemént, nor was the pipe used for the purpose for which it was constructed. And it was shown that to give Irvin the full benefit of his purchase, he would be obliged to destroy the easement. The action was brought on a bond given by Irvin for his purchase-money. Woodward, P. J., instructed the jury that the value of the easement was the measure of the defendant’s damages, which he might deduct from the purchase-money.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Burnside

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Burnside, J.

The hills of exception to evidence are not sustained. No rule of the law of evidence was violated. It would be a waste of time to discuss the bills in detail.

Nor are we able to discover that the error assigned to the charge is in a better situation. We think the court adopted the correct rule in estimating any damage Irvin sustained. It was certainly proper for the jury to regard the whole purchase.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Andrien v. Heffernan149 A. 184 (Pa. 1930)

Most recent

  1. Andrien v. Heffernan149 A. 184 (Pa. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list