Benners v. Clemens
Benners versus Clemens
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered, January 20th 1868, by Thompson, C. J.
The debt sued for was a debt contracted in England, or rather the balance of a debt contracted and partially liquidated there by returns in quercitron bark. In the absence of any understanding to the contrary the balance was due and payable there. This being so, it was payable in the legal currency of the country, denominated pounds, shillings and pence, and the representative of gold. Of course, as any payment obtained here would be payable in legal tender notes, the value of the gold in legal tenders, with interest, would be what in amount the judgment should be. The lex loci contractus must control in interpreting the contract: Allshouse v. Ramsay, 6 Whart. 331 ; Watson v. Brewster, 1 Barr 381, and authorities cited by the defendant in error. This view of the case is sufficient to affirm the judgment without reference to any question arising on our Legal Tender Acts.
The judgment being right in amount is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Alvin H. Frankel, Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Lynn E. Hoyt, Deceased v. Hohns-Manville Corporation, Turner Construction Company
- Frankel v. Johns-Manville Corp.
- Acacia Mutual Life Insurance v. Ambrose
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Ziegler
- Newspaper Readers Service, Inc. v. Canonsburg Pottery Co.
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. Levine
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.