TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Williamsport Gas Co. v. Pinkerton

Williamsport Gas Company versus Pinkerton

Williamsport Gas Co. v. Pinkerton, 95 Pa. 62 (1880)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 14, 1880
Judges
Gordon, Green, Mercur, Paxson, Sharswood, Sterrett, Trunkey
Citations
95 Pa. 621880 Pa. LEXIS 281
Headnotes
1. The corporation which issues a coupon bond, is in the position of the maker of a promissory note, not of the drawer of a check or bill of exchange. There is no obligation on the holder to present and demand it within a reasonable time. 2. P. held a coupon bond of the defendant. Suit was brought on a coupon which stated on its face that it was payable at a certain banking hous'e on December 1st 1875. Funds were sent to the bank to pay the interest and all coupons presented were paid, until December 22d 1875, when the bank failed. P. afterwards demanded payment of the corporation and was refused, when he brought the suit against it: Held, he could recover.
Summary
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming county: Of May Term 1880, No. 145. Case stated, wherein John J. Pinkerton, was plaintiff, and the Williamsport Gas Company, defendant. • The case as stated, was, in substance, as follows : In 1868 the Williamsport Gas Company issued bonds to the amount of $30,000, payable to bearer on the 1st of June 1878, at the banking house of Kirk, MacVeagh & Co., West Chester, Pa. To each bond were attached coupons for the payment of the semiannual interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum, payable to bearer at said .banking house, on the first days of December and June in each year respectively. On the 1st of May 1871, the firm of Kirk, MacVeagh & Co., was dissolved, and a new bank incorporated by the Act of March 15th 1871, as the Bank of Brandy-wine. Erorn the time of its organization, the Bank of Brandywine occupied the same premises previously occupied by the banking house of Kirk, MacVeagh & Co., and in many instances accounts were carried from their books to those of the Bank of Brandywine. The interest-coupons on the bonds of the Williamsport Gas Company, as they matured, were regularly presented to, and paid by, the banking house'of Kirk, MacVeagh & Co., and the Bank of Brandywine, until December 1st 1875, the Williamsport Gas Company providing funds for their payment by deposit. The account was opened in the books of Kirk, MacVeagh & Co., November 30th 1868, in the name of “Interest Williamsport Gas Loan,” and transferred to the books of the Bank of Brandywine on May 1st 1871, where it was opened and continued in the name of “ Williamsport Interest.” The account was credited with “draft,” and charged with the coupons by number when presented and paid. On the 29th of November 1875, the Williamsport Gas Company remitted to the Bank of Brandywine a sight draft on New York for $1140, to pay the semi-annual interest coupons due December 1st 1875. The account of “ Williamsport Interest,” on the books of said bank, was credited with $1140 on November 30th 1875. The Bank of Brandywine paid all coupons presented prior to December 22d 1875, and on that day suspended, and made an assignment for the benefit of her creditors. The sum of $524.40 remained, after the suspension, to the credit of the account of “ Williamsport Interest.” Since the assignment of the Bank of Brandywine for the benefit of creditors, the coupons of the Williamsport Gas Company maturing subsequent to December 1st 1875, have been paid through the National Bank of Chester county, at West Chester, Pa. The plaintiff residing at West Chester, Pa., was the owner of one of said bonds, and had regularly presented the coupons maturing thereon since May 1st 1871, and prior to December 1st 1875, to the said Bank of Brandywine, by whom they were paid. He now seeks to recover from the Williamsport Gas Company the amount of the coupon maturing December 1st 1875 (of which he was then, and still is, the owner), said coupon not having been presented at the Bank of Brandywine for payment prior to the suspension of said bank, on December 22d 1875. The said coupon is in the words and figures following, to wit: “ The Williamsport Gas Company will pay the bearer at the banking house of Kirk, MacVeagh & Co., West Chester, Pa., on the first day of December 1875, twenty dollars, being six months’ interest on bond No. 18. “$20. “T. Coryell, Treasurer.” After the assignment by the Bank of Brandywine for the benefit of creditors, the plaintiff demanded payment of the above-recited coupon of the,defendant, at the office of defendant, in the city of Williamsport, Pa., and payment having been refused, he brought suit thereon, March 3d 1877, before one of the aldermen of said city, and obtained judgment on the 9th of March 1877, for the sum of $23.12, the amount of said coupon with interest from December 1st 1875. From this judgment the defendant appealed. The question for the court was, whether, under these circumstances, the plaintiff was entitled to recover, and if so, whether to recover interest also, and from what date. The court entered judgment for $23.23, which was the amount of the coupon with interest from March 3d 1877; when the defendant took this writ,, and assigned this action of the court for error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered Per Curiam.

_ _ The corporation which issues acoppon bond is in the position of a maker of a promissory, no'te, not of the drawer of a check or bill of exchange. There is no obligation on the holder to present and demand it within a reasonable time. The same rule applies to the coupons as to the bond. In fact he may hold on to the coupons just as long as he can hold on to the bond without requiring payment. The coupon is nothing but an acknowledgment of interest due, and it is but an incident of the principal. It is attached to the bond and may be detached from it for the convenience of the holder. The possession by the corporation is evidence-of its payment. The banking house at which it was made payable were the agents of the corporation, and the holder could not lose in any event by their insolvency.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 11916: 11929: 11930: 11934: 11937: 11946: 219152026peak 1946 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kalman v. Treasure County275 P. 743 (Mont. 1929)
  2. Binghampton Pharmacy v. First National Bank131 Tenn. 711 (1915)
  3. McDowell v. North Side Bridge Co.97 A. 97 (Pa. 1916)
  4. Morley v. University of Detroit256 N.W. 861 (Mich. 1934) · Dissent
  5. Jacobs v. Mohnton Trust Co.149 A. 887 (Pa. 1930)
  6. Mershon v. Millerstown Borough193 A. 328 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1937)

Most recent

  1. Girard Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities51 A.2d 623 (Pa. 1946)
  2. Girard Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.57 Pa. D. & C. 194 (1946)
  3. Mershon v. Millerstown Borough193 A. 328 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1937)
  4. Morley v. University of Detroit256 N.W. 861 (Mich. 1934) · Dissent
  5. Jacobs v. Mohnton Trust Co.149 A. 887 (Pa. 1930)
  6. Kalman v. Treasure County275 P. 743 (Mont. 1929)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list