TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tenan v. Cain

J. B. Tenan v. Hamilton Cain and M. H. Stevenson

Tenan v. Cain, 41 A. 594 (Pa. 1898)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 31, 1898
Docket
Nos. , No. 94
Judges
Cubiam, Dean, Fell, Gbeen, McCollum, Mitchell, Williams
Citations
41 A. 594188 Pa. 2421898 Pa. LEXIS 601
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
Ejectment — Mortgage—Scire facias — Terre-tenant—Executors and administrators — Void judgment —Purchaser under defective judgment. A judgment on a scire facias sur mortgage against an executor for want of an affidavit of defense is defective on the face of the record, and a person who purchases the mortgaged premises at a sheriff’s sale under such a judgment takes no title, even if he is without notice of the rights of the terre-tenant who has not been served. If the sheriff’s vendee brings an action of ejectment for the land, and the trial court instead of directing a verdict for the defendant submits the case to the jury, and a verdict and judgment is rendered in favor of the defendant, the Supreme Court will not consider the rulings covered by the assignments of error, since the rulings, whether correct or not, did the plaintiff no injury.
Summary
Appeal, No. 94, Oct. T., 1898, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., Feb T., 1898, No. 42, on verdict for defendant. Ejectment for a tract of land in Hanover township. Before Taylob, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court in this case, and in the case of Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Tenan, ante, p. 239. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were various instructions, and rulings on evidence immaterial to this report.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cubiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Peb Cubiam,

Appellant’s title as put in evidence by him at the trial rested upon the judgment in Mutual Life Insurance Co. to use, etc., v. Tenan, Exr., and the levari facias and sheriff’s deed in that case. *243 We have just reversed that judgment as unauthorized and void. It was incapable of supporting an execution, and as the defect was one apparent on the face of the record, the sheriff’s vendee would have taken no title, even if a purchaser without notice of the terre-tenant’s rights. It is clear therefore that appellant showed no title, and the learned judge below might properly have directed a verdict for the defendant. It is not therefore worth while to discuss the assignments of error. Whether correct or not the rulings did appellant no injury.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11930: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Buxton v. Pennsylvania Lumber Co.221 F. 718 (N.D. Cal. 1914)
  2. Musser v. Grove15 Pa. D. & C. 628 (1930)

Most recent

  1. Musser v. Grove15 Pa. D. & C. 628 (1930)
  2. Buxton v. Pennsylvania Lumber Co.221 F. 718 (N.D. Cal. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list