Commonwealth v. Keystone Laundry Co.
Commonwealth v. Keystone Laundry Company
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam,
The appellant was incorporated for the purpose of “ cleansing, bleaching, starching and smoothing textile fabrics by the use of machinery and mechanical appliances, and the application of skilled manual operation.” Its principal business is, as properly stated by the court below, “washing and ironing.” In carrying on this business, it needs soap and dyes, and, even if it does manufacture these two articles for its own use, instead of buying them, such manufacture of them does not make the “washing and ironing” concern a “manufacturing plant and business,” as defined by statute, lexicon or judicial utterance.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- HAB Industries, Inc. v. City of Allentown
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Custer County
- City of Reading v. Forty-Five Noble Street, Inc.
- United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review
- Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of Boston
- Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation
Most recent
- HAB Industries, Inc. v. City of Allentown
- City of Reading v. Forty-Five Noble Street, Inc.
- Pellerin Laundry Mach. Sales Co. v. Cheney
- Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of Boston
- Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation
- United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.