TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lane v. Cayuta Wheel & Foundry Co.

Lane v. Cayuta Wheel & Foundry Company

Lane v. Cayuta Wheel & Foundry Co., 69 A. 1127 (Pa. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 20, 1908
Docket
Nos. , No. 57
Judges
Brown, Elkin, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter
Citations
69 A. 1127220 Pa. 6031908 Pa. LEXIS 824
Disposition
Affirmed.
Summary
Appeal, No. 57, Jan. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Bradford Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 436, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Ella M. Lane v. Cayuta Wheel & Foundry Company.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Elkin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Mr. Justice Elkin,

Judgment affirmed for reasons stated in the opinion in Lane v. Sayre Water Company, No. 58, January Term, 1908, ante, p. 599.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 11952: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Gatta85 A. 721 (Del. 1913)
  2. Cepull v. Borland81 Pa. D. & C. 527 (1952)

Most recent

  1. Cepull v. Borland81 Pa. D. & C. 527 (1952)
  2. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Gatta85 A. 721 (Del. 1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list