TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nydes v. Home Guards of America

Nydes v. Home Guards of Am., 100 A. 945 (Pa. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 5, 1917
Docket
Nos. , No. 12
Judges
Brown, Frazer, Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart
Citations
100 A. 945256 Pa. 3851917 Pa. LEXIS 622
Disposition
Affirmed.
Summary
Appeal, No. 12, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1912, No. 2242, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Bessie Nydes v. Home Guards of America. Assumpsit on a death benefit certificate. Before Hay-maker, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,408.50 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant and in refusing to enter judgment for defendant n. o. v.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Stewart

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Mr. Justice Stewart,

This and the next preceding case, Nydes v. Royal Neighbors of America, in which the opinion has just been handed down, were tried together in the court below and were argued as one here. Both were actions on certificates of assurance issued by different companies to' Peter Nydes of like date. The defense in each was that the assured, both in his application for membership and in his replies to the questions addressed to him by the medical examiner, had made false representations as to his state of health, his freedom from disease, etc. These questions and answers differed in no material respect in the several cases, and the testimony taken is applicable to both alike. In the opinion filed in the earlier case we have discussed at length the questions that arose, and inasmuch as both present the same governing considerations, the judgment must be the same in each. For the reasons there expressed the judgment in this case is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list