Clarion Borough Petition
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from the Superior Court, allowed because a constitutional question was alleged to be involved; but the record shows no such point presented to that tribunal. Neither the statement of questions involved, the assignments of error in, nor the opinion of, the Superior Court mentions, or indicates, a constitutional point. Under such circumstances appellants have no standing to be heard in this court: Chartiers Creek Bridge, 235 Pa. 365 .
The appeal is dismissed at the cost of appellants.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.