Milford Township Appeal
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Opinion Per Curiam,
This appeal is from a proceeding which was instituted in the court below by a motion to strike off, as invalid, a borough ordinance more than a year after the effective date of the ordinance. By statutory requirement, such a proceeding must be instituted within thirty days after the ordinance takes effect. See Act of May 18, 1933, P.L. 818, 5'3 P.,S. §12900 (pkt. part). The court below should, therefore, have summarily dismissed the motion as having been lodged out of time.
Appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
("General expressions used in a statute are restricted to things and persons similar to those specifically enumerated in the language preceding the general expressions.")
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Petty v. Hospital Service Ass'n
- In re Estate of Bartol
- Homziak v. General Electric Capital Warranty Corp.
- In re Condemnation by the Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, of Right of Way for State Route 79, Section W10
- In re Condemnation by Commonwealth
- PICPA Foundation for Education & Research v. Commonwealth
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.