Commonwealth v. Smith
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. James Melvin SMITH
Commonwealth v. Smith, 632 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1993)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
ORDER PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
LARSEN, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“There is no explicit requirement in Dugger or its progeny that the certification be made specifically in the notice of appeal.”)
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.