TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth v. Dugan

Commonwealth v. Dugan, 74 A.2d 508 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 20, 1950
Docket
Nos. , No. 64
Judges
Arnold, Dithrich, Hirt, Reno, Rhodes, Ross
Citations
74 A.2d 508167 Pa. Super. 221950 Pa. Super. LEXIS 427

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam,

Appellant Dugan was convicted of the same offense and in the same trial as Flaherty, whose appeal has been disposed of in an opinion filed this day. Dugan raises the same questions which have been completely answered in the Flaherty opinion. A separate opinion is unnecessary.

Judgment and sentence affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 11994: 119642026peak 1964 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commonwealth v. La640 A.2d 1336 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994)
  2. Commonwealth v. BRUNO201 A.2d 434 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Commonwealth v. La640 A.2d 1336 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994)
  2. Commonwealth v. BRUNO201 A.2d 434 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list