TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth v. Miller

Commonwealth v. Miller, 185 A.2d 657 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 15, 1962
Docket
Nos. , No. 333
Judges
Ervin, Flood, Montgomery, Rhodes, Watkins, Woodside, Wright
Citations
185 A.2d 657199 Pa. Super. 3951962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 556

Opinion of the Court — Wright

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Wright, J.,

This appeal is controlled by our opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Dalton, 199 Pa. Superior Ct. 388 , 185 A. 2d 653 . The only difference is a matter of procedure. Each appellant was granted a supersedeas conditioned upon the entry of security. Dalton filed the required bond. Miller did not.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Commonwealth v. Dalton, 185 A.2d 653 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1962) 21

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list