TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth v. Gaspero

Commonwealth v. Gaspero, 213 A.2d 88 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 9, 1965
Docket
Nos. , No. 278
Judges
Flood
Citations
213 A.2d 88206 Pa. Super. 7251965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 929

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam :

The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Flood, J., absent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States ex rel. Gaspero v. Pennsylvania267 F. Supp. 316 (E.D. Pa. 1966)

Most recent

  1. United States ex rel. Gaspero v. Pennsylvania267 F. Supp. 316 (E.D. Pa. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list