TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth v. Cashmere

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Paul E. CASHMERE

Commonwealth v. Cashmere, 435 A.2d 630 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 9, 1981
Docket
No. 345
Judges
Cavanaugh, Disalle, Montemuro
Citations
435 A.2d 630291 Pa. Super. 1841981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3548

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM:

This case is remanded to the trial court for the filing of a written statement as to the evidence relied upon and the reasons for revoking appellant’s probation. See Commonwealth v. DeLuca, 275 Pa.Super. 176, 182 , 418 A.2d 669, 673 (1980); Commonwealth v. Davis, 234 Pa.Super. 31, 39 , 336 A.2d 616, 621 (1975). Jurisdiction is retained by this court pending remand.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Commonwealth v. Davis, 336 A.2d 616 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975) 108
Commonwealth v. Deluca, 418 A.2d 669 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980) 28

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list